You are here Home » National » Impact of ‘One Man, One Shilling, One Vote’ on Northern Kenya

Impact of ‘One Man, One Shilling, One Vote’ on Northern Kenya

In 2010, Kenya adopted a progressive constitution. Former Chief Justice David Maraga praised it, stating, “The Constitution of Kenya is one of the best constitutions in the world, if only we could implement it.” Article 81 emphasizes ‘Equality of Vote,’ which ensures that each vote holds equal weight.

Consequently, the Constitution aims for universal suffrage and fair representation. Thus, a voter in Banisa Constituency, Mandera County, holds the same importance as a voter in Mathira Constituency.

However, the Constitution promotes equity in resource distribution. Article 203 considers economic disparities and mandates affirmative action for disadvantaged areas.

Despite these provisions, Northern Kenya has faced significant historical injustices.

After independence, the region continued to suffer neglect. For instance, the 1965 Sessional Paper No. 10 worsened this issue by focusing resources on ‘high potential’ areas like Kiambu, Kirinyaga, and Nyeri. This approach left Northern regions, which rely on a livestock-based economy, underfunded.

Furthermore, the ‘Shifta War’ and calls for secession highlighted frustration with this marginalization. The Wagalla massacre, in particular, underscored the severe neglect and alienation of the region.

Even after recognizing the Northern Frontier Districts as part of Kenya, the region remained underdeveloped. It lacked essential services such as clean water, tarmacked roads, and electricity.

Consequently, Northern Kenya fell significantly behind other regions and arrived at devolution 40 years later.

On a positive note, devolution offered hope through equitable resource distribution, managed by the Constitutional Commission on Revenue Allocation (CRA).

Nevertheless, Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua’s recent debate advocates for allocating resources based on the number of votes each County has.

This approach risks deepening regional inequalities. In particular, Arid and Semi-Arid Counties already face high poverty levels and low literacy rates compared to Central Kenya.

Central Kenya benefits from substantial infrastructure and presidential leadership, which starkly contrasts with Northern Kenya’s minimal road development.

As the Deputy President seeks political positioning, it’s crucial to uphold the Constitution’s principles of unity. Northern Kenya has begun to see improvements through devolution.

Projects such as the Isiolo-Moyale and Isiolo-Mandera highways represent significant strides. Therefore, equitable treatment, as envisioned by the Constitution, remains essential.

This approach will help Northern Kenya fully integrate into national development and feel respected as part of Kenya.


Ali Edin is a socio-political commentator from Isiolo, specializing in Kenya’s development and constitutional issues.

2 thoughts on “Impact of ‘One Man, One Shilling, One Vote’ on Northern Kenya

  1. Gachagua myopism sees flashy Eastleigh, South B and C and conclude that equalization fund, relief food and affirmative action have catapult North Eastern lots a head of economic game.
    He should dispense off jittery to see clearly dejected and sorry lives in the larger ASAL.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Skip to content